Dear Chris and Michael,
The time line is... the NICE appraisal committee with publish their recommendations within 30 days of the ACD meeting (March 9th). I had confirmation from NICE that the petition - which at the time I sent it had 1200 odd signatures- had been given to the chair of the committee on the day of the meeting.
The official comment from us (CML SUPPORT GROUP) was agreed and fully supported by both Macmillan and the Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research Fund and both organisations added their logos to our submission.
I know that the various groups of CML doctors also made robust submissions.
The appraisal committee is considering all the objections and will as I said above published their findings as a FAD (final appraisal document) at some point this month. If that document is negative and does not recommend NHS funding then the decision can still be appealed. This would take another few weeks and then they would need to consider the appeal. Should an appeal fail then the recommendation will then become the TAG or Technology Appraisal Guidance.
I am amazed that Michaels consultant is already second guessing the NICE FAD/TAG. This is not correct and any patient that needs a change of therapy to dasatinib or nilotinib can and should fight such a decision.
I have a contact who works in a voluntary capacity to support patients through the 'Exceptional Funding' appeal process. She has been very successful and has helped many patients (not just CML patients) get access to drugs they need.
Michael, please remind me which hospital are your treated at?
The petition now has 1375 signatures... I am trying to get to 1400 before I close it so I advertised it once again this week on my facebook page... perhaps those of you who have a page could do the same and we could see 1400 ... only 25 more signatures!
I will then send it to the DH ministers.
Sandy