I switched to Gleevec after 7 years on sprycell because I thought the sprycell was causing chylous ascites problems. Turns out after 8 months off the TKI drugs it didn't impact the ascites. I switched for 60 days to Bosulif but stopped as we were still trying to identify if the TKI were the cause of the chylous ascites.
Eventually my BCRABL numbers got to high and so we decided I'd go on Gleevec. Seemed to make sense, in my mind, Gleevec is tried and tested and (here comes my faulty logic?) with SO MANY PEOPLE ON GLEEVEC IT MUST BE FAIRLY DECENT ON THE SIDE EFFECTS otherwise people would switch to other drugs.... right?
But gleevec, for me, seems kinda awful. Yeah, I know dying of leukemia is awful but I went 7 years on sprycel without much of an issue.
Now on Gleevec I have all sorts of issues, not the least of which are nausea, headaches, dry mouth, and other issues -- and I'm only in my 3rd week.
So I guess everyone is different? I'm trying to find people who LOVE gleevec, who have NO PROBLEM with gleevec, and who just wouldn't switch because it's such a great choice compared to the other TKI's.
So far, I'm still searching.
Thanks
Jim