You are here

Tfr fail?

Categories:

Hi all

I've been on a TFR trial since November, having successfully dose reduced last year from 400mg to 200mg to 100mg.

I was undetectable in January and last weeks bcr/abl is 0.0030%

The lab is in a different location than my other tests due to travel.

Thoughts?

Eva

Eva, becoming.detectable during a TFR attempt doesn't always lead to relapse:

during the STIM2 Stop Study: http://bit.ly/1IbwZuh 2011
treated only with imatinib; MR4.5 DMR of at least 2 years duration;. median age 61, 62 men. 62 women
76 of 124 (61%) remained treatment free ... However 41, of the 76, lost PCRU without clear molecular relapse (loss of MMR). In this so-called-fluctuation group of patients, 7 were found positive once, 6 twice, 12 patients between 3 and 5 times, 10 patients between 6 and 10 times and 6 patients more than 10 times confirming that BCR-ABL reappearance does not automatically mean clinical relapse.

Personally, I have been TFR for over five years, and have been detectable for most of that time:
​2014 U, U, U, U (12/07 began dose reduction w/each continuing undetectable)
2015 300, 250, 200, 150
2016 100, 50/100, 100, 10/17 TFR
2017 01/17 TFR, 04/18 TFR, 07/18 TFR 0.0012, 08/29 TFR 0.001, 10/17 TFR 0.000
2018 01/16 TFR 0.0004, 04/16 TFR 0.0045, 07/17 TFR 0.0018, 10/15 TFR 0.0150
2019 01/15 TFR 0.0144, 04/15 TFR 0.0134, 07/15 TFR 0.0042, 10/15 TFR 0.0126
2020 10/13 TFR 0.0127
2021 04/15 TFR 0.0107. 10/13 TFR 0.0356, 12/07 TFR 0.0103

Clinical relapse is defined as exceeding MMR, 0.1.  

Wishing you the best,
Buzz

Thanks buzz, i figured you'd have some comforting words.

I think im going to use this as a much needed lever to remove stress from my life and encourage the best TFR attempt.

Any PCR value below 0.01% is indistinguishable from "undetected" in a pure statistical/mathematical sense. It is noise in the test. Many research facilities (e.g. M.D. Anderson) do not even report PCR values beyond two decimal points for that reason. Buzz is quite correct that loss of remission is not considered until PCR rises above MMR - >0.1%.

As Buzz's data shows, he is above 0.01 but below 0.1 and is 'positive' for CML, but his body is handling it without drugs. This is an ideal time for anyone in his situation to focus on immune system health (get those T-cells strong) so his body can take care of CML on its own. Presence of CML at these levels is not disease. Trend is important. Buzz is fluctuating within one log. Selenium, curcumin, magnesium, zero sugar, low carb (i.e. keto-like diet) all negatively affects CML stem cells which are needed to restart CML-disease. Proliferation requires weakened immune surveillance.

In your case, your PCR is less than 0.01%

However, 'detection' is always uncomfortable to see in a lab report when in TFR so I understand the concern. Stay vigilant and test again in 3 months. If there is a trend upward, you will likely catch the uptick and can act. CML is a slow disease in chronic phase. You will have plenty of time.

 

Thanks scuba....i can certainly get on board with the suggestions though zero sugar will be tricky for my sweet tooth.

There's mathematics and how it feels... Which is less logical!

My oncologist is already saying that if i need to go back on medication I'd need to take a different TKI. Which is frustrating as this was NOT my understanding when he was pushing for tfr. Afaik i can go back on lower dose imatanib. The prospect of a new tki feels like a punishment dangled in front of my for trying to dose reduce

I would strongly encourage you to consider a new TKI and not go back to imatinib (e.g. dasatnib). The reasoning is that each TKI works a bit differently and attacks some clones of CML better than others. In this way, you attack what is likely emerging from TFR. And you won't need full dose to put you back in TFR. I went from full dose imatinib which barely worked in my case to low dose dasatinib which put me into "undetected" straight away.

 

Ok....well shoot if id known that in might have kept on low dose imatanib and not got for tfr :(

I had next to no issues with imatanib

Ok....well shoot if id known that in might have kept on low dose imatanib and not got for tfr :(

I had next to no issues with imatanib

Ok....well shoot if id known that in might have kept on low dose imatanib and not got for tfr :(

I had next to no issues with imatanib

Eva, if you do proceed to relapse, since you are dealing with a European onc, who wants you to change TKIs in that event, the odds are high that he/she will insist on restarting you on full dosage of that new TKI.  .When CML is at a very low level, such as after a failed TFR attempt, it typically only requires a minimal TKI dosage for the CML patient to regain his, or her, prior status.

Hoping you don't relapse, but if you do, be prepared to fight for what you want, which might include you restarting on a lower dosage of Imatinib.

Wishing you the best,
Buzz

Hi again buzz ... Can you point me in the right direction of any literature that might support my stance? Ie going back on low dose imatanib.

He is a hematologist from Europe but is using US guidelines for TFR. He was kinda pushy for TFR when i dose reduced, even though he was against dose reducing. I really don't know what to make of him.

However I'm trying to concentrate on keeping below 0.1.
I was having some anxiety about other stuff in life before this happened so it's not the easiest time to stay positive.

Eva, the U.S. guidelines center around the requisites used in the Stop Studies, which, with the exception of the single 50% dosage reduction during the UK Destiny Trial, don't include anything about dosage reduction, especially the highly successful gradual dosage reduction.  During the Stop Studies, including the UK Destiny Trial, patients who failed their TFR attempt were restarted on the full dosage of their given TKI.

Although gradual dosage reduction has proven to be  highly successful and very beneficial to the CML community, not all oncs/hemas, especially European oncs/hemas have gotten on board with it.  The longer a CML patient is on the full dosage of any TKI, the higher the probability that they will suffer from the toxic side-effects.  Dosage reduction lessens the probability of side-effects.  After a CML patient has been either undetected, or plateaued, at a low CML level, for a prolonged period of time, generally, a year, or so, gradual dosage reduction can typically safely begin.  Not all CML patients will reach TFR, but almost all can safely reduce their TKI dosage to a very low level.

Restarting on a low TKI dosage, after a failed TFR attempt, is relatively new but I haven't, as yet, seen anyone fail to regain their prior status when doing so.  A few examples:

​tiredblood
prior to TFR attempt, on Sprycel 20mg

03/11/2021 0.164% :(
04/07/2021 Restarted on Bosulif 100mg/day
04/16/2021 0.128%
05/17/2021 0.025%
08/12/2021 0.000%

shweflen 
prior to TFR attempt, on Imatinib 300mg
11/17/2020 BCR-ABL:ABL = 0.026
11/24/2020 restarted on 100mg/day imatinib (onc recommended 300mg/day)
12/14/2020 BCR-ABL:ABL = 0.012
02/16/2021 BCR-ABL:ABL = 0.004
03/01/2021 started 100 mg imatinib every other day (record low 50mg/day dosage)
03/15/2021 BCR-ABL:ABL = Not Detected
05/19/2019 BCR-ABL:ABL = Not Detected

Debdoodah, on the U.S. LLS CML forum, will likely soon be restarting on Sprycel 20mg after a failed TFR attempt.  Note: she had been undetected on Sprycel 20mg for a period of years.

Update: after the blip in march , the next 3 tests were undectable again and im now 10 months in TFR and switching back to quarterly tests.

Hurray!

Lovely news Evah, I bet you are happy, Very happy! Reading what people here say about TFR, gives me some courage to start it myself.

I have been undetectable for 3 yrs, 20mg Dasatinib. Consultant suggested to start TFR in October, but I am not sure.

Do you Eva, Scuba, anyone, think I should rather reduced from taking 20mg daily, to taking 20mg every other day? I would prefer this, it is not as drastic as complete stoppage....

Thank you,

pigeon.

 

 

I spent half of 2021 dose reducing before tfr so I'd support it.

Make sure you are in a good place with the rest of your life before moving to tfr, i found it mentally tougher than i bargained for.... Whereas i felt comfy with dose reduction.

Good luck!

Eva, you are so right about the importance of being in a good place in our lives, before attempting TFR.

I reckon that our immune system is finely tuned to our emotions, and to our state of mind in general. It can be a friend or a foe. So, until I reach that happy place.....I shall just take baby steps and start with dose reducing, taking dasatinib on alternating days.

See what my consultant says, but I can tell you, I don't think I'm going to stop, not just yet.

My very best to you.

pigeon

Hi,evaH,and anyone else trying TFR .I am considering TFR in a few months .Could you tell me if you feel any better or any difference in your self by not taking your meds.I am down to 10 mg Dasatinib and just wonder if you don't feel any better is it easier just to continue taking this low dose instead of having to do more frequent blood tests and worrying about numbers rising  . THANK YOU,Denise.

Hi Denise, I was not aware that dasatinib comes in 10 mg doses. My consultant suggested  TFR, I am not too happy about stopping completely, and was thinking of taking dasatinib 20mg every other day.

I can see why you are  hesitant about TFR, it feels like our security rug is suddenly pulled from under us. As Eva said, she found TFR mentally quite tough; I concur, just the thought of it frightens me.

Could you please tell me a little bit more about 10mg dasatinib? I just checked and saw dasatinib 10mg comes as a powder for oral suspension, do you find it easy to take? I like the idea of taking such a tiny daily dose.smiley

Thank you,

pigeon

Hi Sunny ,I cut mine in half with a pill splitter .I was advised to take 10mg every day rather than 20 every other day by a fellow CML er on here .My Doctor was totally against me reducing but I went ahead anyway .I have stayed undetected on this dose .Denise.

Hi all

I cant say i noticed feeling better on half dose, i think my hair got a bit thicker at some point.

I started tfr in Nov 2021 and since March 2022 I've had a lot of muscle stiffness and low level joint pain. There are no inflammation markers in my blood so I'm assuming its related to the discontinuation of TKIs and I'm ignoring the discomfort mostly and trying to do stretching ever morning.

It might also be simply getting back to more physical activity after lockdown or maybe long covid - i never tested positive but i deffo had something viral and respiratory at the end of feb

Thank you Denise, it really took courage to go against what your doctor said, and make your own decision. I think sometimes doctors are being over cautious and therefore do not see the whole picture; they seem to forget, or ignore, the side effects that a patient might be exposed to, if taking an unnecessary higher dose.

I am glad you were proven right and that you stay undetected. That is what we all want: Undetected Is Good!!     pigeon

Hi, I have been a bit of a rebel ,My Doc originally wanted me on 100 mg but I refused ,if a grown man of over 6 feet can be knocked off his feet with that dose ,then a little 5' 3 " woman like me would be floored for sure .I stood my ground with 50 mg for a short while and gradually reduced when I thought it was the right time for me .My Doctor always disagreed with me ,who is not a CML specialist .Fingers crossed it's working for me .

I've had a few hematologists since my cml journey began in 2016, none were keen on a TFR trial or even dose reduction. I started dose reduction without telling the doc, i waited for the next bcr/abl test and then told him and after that he sorta did a 180 and kinda pushed me to go for TFR... Which i found a bit strange but it worked out.

Well, Denise, talking about a rebel, but....this time a rebel with a cause! I couldn't agree more, 100mg dasatinib is no longer favoured as an entry dose. By now, hematologists should know that with dasatinib, less sometimes means more, i.e. more positive outcome with less of the menace of pleural effusion.  I reckon that you were probably right in figuring out that the damage it inflicted on a 6 footer, would have been enhanced on little you.

Some doctors are just not open minded enough to listen to their patients and have an open dialogue with them. He really should have taken the time to check the latest research on dasatinib. Lucky you are proactive, and stood your ground. After all, it is your health, your life, not his.

I shall have a discussion with my consultant about reducing to 10 mg. Either this, or 20 mg on alternate days. See what she says; she is very knowledgeable, so I shall take her advice.

Yap, fingers crossed, all the best,   pigeon.