You are here

New to this forum

Hi,


I've lurked around your site for quite some time. I was Dx with CML in May 2009 with a wbc count of 321,000. I went on to Glivec / Imatinib 400mg after a few weeks on Hydroxyurea to bring the counts down a bit. That pushed me towards CCyR (I was at 2 out of 100 cells at my second follow up BM after 12 months) although my PB wbc BCR/Abl ratio was stuck at between 7% and 6% for the last 6 months or so.  So the doctor has managed to get my medication changed - for which I am very grateful - to Dasatinib 100mg (commencing 16 months into treatment) as clearly my reponse to date, whilst not 'failing' (less than MCyR or 35 out of 100) is sub-optimal.

I have hopes that the Dasatinib will - because of the potency - push me past CCyR and towards MMR (or better) in a fairly short period. I'm not aware of any specific mutation status I may have at present - as my conversations with my haematologist are a bit perfunctory to be honest - and I haven't asked.  (Don't want to know, really!!)


My feelings:


Obviously diagnosis with CML, at 45, was a great shock - as I hadn't really taken notice of my phyisical condition by the time I did go to my GP about 'back pain'. This was due to a massively enlarged spleen. I'd also been having quite a bit of acid reflux, weight loss (both probably due to gastric restriction) and significant breathlessness (anemia) by then.


Anyway a scary moment to say the least. Thankfully I had the loving support of my family and the assurance of the doctor that modern treatment was (mostly) effective. As I initially responded rapidly to the treatment - and general health was not so much restored as transformed in a matter of weeks, I started to find hope again. But I it took rather longer - most of that year - before that I allowed myself to feel cautiously justified in that hope. I also had a bout of mild depression (anxiety, really) in the meantime as the first BM follow approached - the results of which were disappointing.

 

Now that the disease appears to be under control (although not as much as would be liked) I am amazed at how my feelings have changed towards the positive. There is no reason, certainly, to assume 'the worst' at this stage. And the reasons to be hopeful seem to gain weight with time. For instance, when told that I probably needed to switch drugs I could have seen that as a  'failure' or a 'defeat'. Instead I accepted it in terms of 'aiming higher' - a 'glass half full' perspective if you please. The Sprycel - I tell myself - is designed to bind to the rogue BCR/Abl even tigher than Imatinib. Also, the theraputic dose is just 100mg - one quarter of standard Glivec - hence it must be 'good stuff' and my liver cells could do with the rest. Another boon is that Sprycel can be taken without food - and thus at any convenient fixed time (eg when out and about)

 

Unlike post-diagnosis - when the term 'blast crisis' kept beating around inside my head - I can take a clear interest in the disease. Sometimes I read something which makes me feel slightly vulnerable again - but mostly the information I am getting is unremittingly positive. Let me make a rather bold statement which I'm cofident is true: Whilst I may not make it through, long term, nearly all of you fellow CMLers, reading this, WILL! That's a fact which needs to imparted I feel.

 

TKIs (including, it appears to be case, Imatinib) largely squeeze the disease down to a pea and keep it there. There is even evidence of complete clearance of disease by Imatinib alone in a modest but significant number of cases - allowing suspension of all treatment. So, just think how second generation TKIs, if given as frontline treatment, will raise that bar? When Imatinib was discovered they didn't really how it worked as well as it did - just that it did work! Now that the mechanisms of disease progression are being studied ever closer new insights are emerging which allow better results to be achieved whatever TKI is selected - as they all work slightly differently - to shut down and 'silence' the BCR/Abl protein.

 

I've not seen anyone mention here yet a new drug - ponatinib (AP24534) - which has the potential to completely inhibit the dreaded T315I mutation. If they have cracked that one, BCR/Abl must surely be defeated finally? But I suspect no one will be satisfied until newer TKI's are shown to be permanently effective against advanced/blast crisis disease. (How close is that day now?)

 

Anyway I've gone on far too long already - but I just wanted to introduce myself

 

Love,

Paul

Dear Paul....  welcome to this forum and thank you for sharing your story and experiences since diagnosis. It is good to hear that your clinician is obviously aware of the current guidelines for management of TKI therapy in CML and I wish you well with the change to dasatinib in order to overcome your sub-optimal response to imatinib.

Re: AP24534 (ponatinib)

If you use the search facility on this forum you will come up with several posts regarding this 3rd generation TKI and the current phase ll international trial which will be recruiting resistant and/or intolerant patients over the coming months in Europe as well as Asia and the US.

I have posted a snip from Ariad's press release below... see the link for the full news article.

Please keep updating us on your response to dasatinib. I wish you well and yes I agree there is a lot to be hopeful about.

Sandy

 

ARIAD Announces Initiation of Ponatinib (AP24534) Pivotal Trial in Drug-Resistant or Intolerant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

~Registration trial for approval of ponatinib in CML 

CAMBRIDGE, Mass., Sep 13, 2010 (BUSINESS WIRE) --

ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: ARIA) today announced the initiation of the pivotal Phase 2 clinical trial of its investigational pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor, ponatinib (previously known as AP24534), in patients with resistant or intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). The PACE (Ponatinib Ph+ ALL and CML Evaluation) trial is designed to provide definitive clinical data for regulatory approval of ponatinib in this setting. Ponatinib has been granted orphan drug status in both the United States and Europe for the treatment of CML and Ph+ ALL.

 

"The start of the pivotal PACE trial represents an important step in the development of our second molecularly targeted cancer therapy," stated Harvey J. Berger, M.D., chairman and chief executive officer. "With the strong clinical evidence observed to date of hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular anti-leukemia activity of ponatinib in heavily pretreated patients with CML, including those patients with the T315I mutation for whom no current treatments are available, we are highly optimistic about the likelihood of success for ponatinib in this registration trial. We also believe that the time to full patient enrollment in this study and to potential regulatory approval of ponatinib will be swift."

Trial Design

The PACE trial is a global, single-arm clinical study of oral ponatinib in 320 patients with chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blast phase CML, as well as Ph+ ALL. Patients resistant or intolerant to dasatinib (Sprycel(R)) or nilotinib (Tasigna(R)), or with T315I mutation of BCR-ABL, will be enrolled in the trial. Patients will be grouped into one of six separate cohorts based on their phase of CML (i.e., chronic, accelerated or blast) and BCR-ABL mutation status (i.e., with or without the T315I mutation); Ph+ ALL patients will be grouped with blast phase CML. A total of 160 patients with chronic phase CML will be included. The primary endpoints are major cytogenetic response rate for chronic phase patients and major hematologic response rate for accelerated or blast phase CML patients and Ph+ ALL patients. Secondary endpoints in the trial include major molecular response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival.

Patients will receive ponatinib in tablet form once daily at a dose of 45 mg. The PACE trial will be conducted at approximately sixty centers in North America, Europe, Australia and Asia. Full patient enrollment is anticipated by year-end 2011.

"Clinical results from the ongoing Phase 1 trial of ponatinib, taken together with the preclinical data that characterize ponatinib as a potent, pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor, provide a strong rationale for advancing directly to a pivotal trial of ponatinib in a population of patients who have extremely limited, if any, treatment options," stated Jorge Cortes, M.D., professor and deputy chair, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and a leading investigator in the PACE trial. "There is great interest in the PACE trial from clinicians and patients, and I look forward to having this investigational option available for patients with this disease."

read full news article here:

http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=118422&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1470049&highlight=